Recent Comments
 | Simon Derricutt on Electronic propulsion in … |
 | p.g.sharrow on Electronic propulsion in … |
| Simon Derricutt on Electronic propulsion in … |
| p.g.sharrow on Electronic propulsion in … |
| Simon Derricutt on Electronic propulsion in … |
| p.g.sharrow on Electronic propulsion in … |
| p.g.sharrow on Mother’s Pie Crust |
| p.g.sharrow on PG’s Oatmeal Cookies |
| Simon Derricutt on Electronic propulsion in … |
| p.g.sharrow on Electronic propulsion in … |
| Simon Derricutt on Electronic propulsion in … |
| p.g.sharrow on Electronic propulsion in … |
| Simon Derricutt on Electronic propulsion in … |
| p.g.sharrow on Electronic propulsion in … |
| Simon Derricutt on Electronic propulsion in … |
pgtruspace's blog 
This is a pictorial on energy transfer from atom to atom in radiation and conduction. pg
posted this comment on chiefio blog; in reply to omanuel
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2016/07/01/ceta-canada-e-u-trade-agreement/#comment-69584
omanuel says:
2 July 2016 at 3:10 am
@ Gail Combs & u.k(us)
I do not agree that “our government is a nest of outright traitors” – although that sometimes appears to be the case.
I believe most of those in government were deceived by extremely clever propaganda artists that deceived Hitler’s scientists and most of us, including me. Let me explain:
I have known since 1961 that Weizsacker’s nuclear binding energy equation is:
_ a.) Seriously flawed, but nevertheless
_ b.) Deceptively promoted as rigorously valid in nuclear physics textbooks
Finally, after showing that rest mass data of all 3,000 types of atoms that compromise matter, reveal NEUTRON REPULSION in:
_ c.) Einstein’s 1905 definition of mass as stored energy, E = mc^2; and
_ d.) Aston’s 1922 expression of mass in terms of nuclear packing fraction; but NOT in
_ e.) Weizsacker’s deceptive nuclear binding energy equation . . .
I realized Einstein’s 1905 equation and Aston’s 1922 expression of nuclear packing fractions express thermodynamic state functions, but Weizeracker’s nuclear binding energy equation yields a thermodynamic path function, NOT a thermodynamic state function.
That is how cleverly the source of energy that powers the cosmos and sustains our lives has been hidden from the public since 1946.
p.g.sharrow says:
2 July 2016 at 4:10 am
@omanuel; interesting use of the language, thermodynamic STATE function, rather then, thermodynamic PATH function.
H2O that has 3 states of existence, solid, liquid and gas. Each of which contains a set amount of energy as well as a state conditional amount of energy involved in temperature changes.
Neutrons exist because of pressure from their hydrogen/neutron peers. The result of local energy mater density. Change any part of this and they become hydrogen in another state and release a burst of energy. The proton electron pair actually has several states of existence each of which represents an amount of energy that can be released during a change of state.
Hmmmm……………. that above paragraph might be important.
Oliver, you may have tricked me into seeing THE TREE midst the forest…pg