pgtruspace's blog

about things that interest me.

Category Archives: space flight

Navy Patent to modify Mass / Inertia

Patent for a craft using an Inertial Mass Reduction Device   patent number 10,144,532B2

It was brought to my attention that a researcher for the U.S. Navy had patented a device for the reduction of mass / inertia,  last December, on work he has been doing  for the last 12 years.  There are many citations of papers of his own as well as work done by others,

After reading the patent claims it appears to me that this is a proposed device patent meant to cover the possibilities rather then an actual device. The author seems to use a great deal of techno-babble to dance around,  Not saying Aether,  to describe the EMF manipulation of the near to the craft, space, to reduce the effects of Mass / Inertia by creating a richly confused, 3 Dimensional field…pg

My adventure in 3D printing

monoprice iiip

Monoprice 3D Printer IIIPv2

This Little 3D printer is about the minimum usable, as well as inexpensive, machine available.   $250 at this date.

2 years ago I purchased this little machine, with it’s 200mm x 200mm ( 7.8″ x 7.8″) build plate, so my grandson could get acquainted with this new technology along with his computer abilities. Last fall with the nearby Camp Fire and attendant bad air quality, I was reminded of the need for my  water based air cleaners. I REALLY needed to get new ones built! even if just for me and other family members. So I set the printer up next to my computer and began the design. see: A new old project & The new old project continues. My sister prevailed on me to help launch this new business, it became important to share what I have learned, so she and her son could become familiar with the technology without starting from total

The question of the cost to be a part of using 3D printing was posed and after some thought I replied; “ I am amazed at how little I have spent for the things that this little IIIPv2 printer, Optiplex780 computer and I have accomplished over the last 3 months. For less then a thousand dollars we have created things that would cost me tens of thousands and 2 years, 25 years ago. The 21st century is an Amazing place to this 20th century man…pg


An excellent pdf on filament printing for a beginner starting out…pg

Back in 1986 I took a temporary job fabricating equipment for the Silicon Valley electronics industry. Equipment such as tanks, containment trays, fume duct work and fume scrubbers created from shaped plastic sheet stock parts Hot air welded together with a hot air welder and plastic rod.  Plastic welding requires that the material be heated to the point that it will flow and stick, but not yet a fluid as one uses in metal welding. Plastic is made up of long chain hydrocarbons much like spaghetti that must be heated to the point that it is much like wet cooked pasta that will flow and stick but not break up or have it’s structure destroyed, a rather fine line of temperature that is particular to that type of plastic or alloy of plastics. 3D printing of plastic filaments is carried out under much the same conditions. In this case a miniature extruder under the control of a computer directed robot is laying down “welding rod” to create an object.

The job of the operator is to evaluate the conditions, manage the heat energy and material applied, to create the conditions for a good weld buildup of the part.

Due to the nature of the device being used the building part must remain solidly in place on the build bed during it’s creation. Much of the problems encountered in 3D printing center around keeping the building part in stuck in place. Then, at the end of the build the part should be easily removed so that the bed alignment is not disturbed, the bed surface is not damaged or warped, and the next part can be started.


Printer Notes:

New printer setup:

First thing, check all fasteners for tightness, Modestly tight, not finger tight, not OMG tight, but well fastened. All attachments must remain stable. The software assumes a stable machine and the printer does not self correct for any displacement during operation.

Set printer on a resilient bed such as ridged foam, hard rubber foam, etc. This will greatly reduce noise transfer and reduce resonant movements as the build bed and the mass of the printed object is rapidly moved under the Extruder head. Tie down the “Z” towers solid to frame, with angle braces or attachments to enclosure frame. The towers MUST be stable to the frame, there must be no chance of induced wobble during print bed movements. Any wobble can result in the nozzle encountering the solid work piece, causing a displacement that will ruin the work and may damage the printer.

We will be using ABS so heat management is critical for best results. The operating printer bed must be in a very warm, draft free environment, so an enclosure of some kind is important for consistent results. Being able to see the results of the printer’s operations as they happen is valuable, so the operator can observe, make any adjustments needed is very useful, so a “window” should be considered.

Periodic service before printing:

To insure that the part remains “stuck” to the print bed during it’s creation is critical to success. Be sure to clean bed covering of all dust and oils. Isopropal Alcohol works best, Acetone will work but will damage PEI coverings. Or add a glass covering, glass will require additional time to heat up ( 15-20min.), any glass will work and is less likely to be damaged by use, thicker glass will be less likely to warp, but glass will need additional fasteners to prevent movement on the bed table. Glass adds to the mass of the bed that will be in motion as well as it requires changes in the bottom limit switch position due to it’s additional thickness. We are using a Borosilicate glass covering as that has the best”stick” while hot and best release when cooled. Do not touch the bed covering after cleaning. To improve “stick” of the part to the build bed, various materials are often used to act as temporary “glue”. We are using ABS dissolved in Acetone as our sticking agent for most parts and sometimes Painters tape for really difficult to stick, critical large parts. The Painters Tape is the last resort as it is difficult to remove after the completion of the print. Also used by others are Hair Spray, paper glue stick, as well as salt and sugar. All water based that will stick hot and pop lose on cooling. many people print small and light pieces with no glue and others use special build plate coverings that seem to work with no additional adhesion.  When printing with ABS it is critical that the piece remain warm and well adhered to the build bed during the build process. Any draft that might cool the bed, part or Extruder can ruin the work as well as the “stick”to the bed. Temperature MANAGEMENT is critical while working with ABS!

It is critical to adjust the machinery to be properly aligned, the Extruder must move parallel to the bed to lay even layers onto the surface of the build. In our type of printer the part creation bed moves back and forth in the “Y” plain under the Extruder. The Extruder moves in the side to side motion of the “X” plain and is supported by it’s carriage that is moved in the “Z” direction up to lay down the layers. In our case the Extruder carriage  is controlled by two stepper motors that sometimes get out of synchronization, measure the distance of the carriage rods over the bed to be sure they are parallel to the bed. If not, they can easily be rotated into alignment while the printer is off. While energized they are electrically locked together.

To “level” or trammel the bed to printer nozzle there are adjusting thumb wheels or nuts in each corner of the bed. These are adjusted corner to corner, at least 3 times around. As you adjust one corner the diagonally opposite one will change as the bed teeters on the other two corners. Typewriter paper works well as a thickness gauge. Nozzle should just barely “grip” the paper to the bed. This must be completed on a “Hot” bed to be true for heated operation. It is very important that the first layer be properly stuck to the bed. We use “brim” as an attachment enhancement, as it adds no additional height to the parts, something that is critical to maintain measurements when several parts are assembled together. Once the printer begins the “Brim” the first deposition from the Extruder can be examined for good attachment to the build plate as well as the proper “squish”width and thickness.
It is at this time that I do final adjustment of the bed.

There are also now add-ons that will test the bed surface distances and read into the Gcode the needed nozzle position to properly stick that first layer.

After the print is completed and the print bed cools I slide a sharp thin blade under it to help release it from the bed. The more gently you can remove the part the better to prevent warpage or displacement of the bed adjustments.

Sharp thin blade tool:

I took a good quality, flexible putty knife and ground one side into a wood chisel like sharp edge. To assist lifting the part or for scraping the build plate I use it bevel side up to get under the brim and part to begin lifting them. Caution! Do not use this on a warm soft build plate cover material such as PEI, it will cut right through them, use only on glass or other hard materials.

Software We are using:

Acad 17 is being used to model the parts and export them as stl ‘s. There is also 360 Fusion available to private users as well as several free 3D modeling programs. These stl’s are actually cross-sections of the parts that are being exported into the Slicer that reads these files and then computes the needed instructions that the printer carries out. Printers are dumb, they are a very simple computer that only handle specific movements and temperature. Slicers convert the object into step-by-step directions for the printer to follow. Things like, maintain temperature, start extruding, move x-axis 10 mm and y-axis 2mm, and so on. Most of those commands start with a G, hence the name Gcode. A slicer translates the model slices into the needed movements, speeds and temperatures that are set in configuration instructions which the printer understands.

“Repetier-Host”, A freeware program, is being used to import the stl files and manage the “slicer” that creates the Gcode files and serves those instructions to the printer. Cura, A freeware program, is a slicer that is used to create the needed Gcode files that instruct the printer on how to execute the creation of the required piece. These Gcode files are the instructions that operate the “printer” to build the object one layer at a time by depositing material in amounts and position as dictated by the results of information developed by the “Slicer” program . The needed Gcode is specific to the printer being used and the slicer instructions are set in configuration before the slicer is engaged. The Gcode files are served to the printer through WiFi, or a USB connection or via. a SD card by Repetier-Host the server program that the “slicer” it is embedded in.


Early problem was prints were so porous that water would readily go through the walls but the tops and bottoms were quite solid. Found that tops & bottoms set were default set at 3x and the walls at 1x. I reset the tops & bottoms to 2x as well as set the walls to 2x. This increased the time required and material used but resulted in a substantial improvement in part quality.

increased the extrusion rate 10% to get a stronger more solid part and the result was…

As I was attempting to print the third of 3 motor bases, again I hear this pop and the printer dislocates the “X” axis at about the 1.1 inch line, What the heck! This was 3 times in a row at about the same point, damaging the print. now I will have to section off the top quarter of an inch of the model and print 3 of those and repair all 3 motor bases. But why ?  I sleep on this problem and…  of course! the extrusion is too high. We have been making the layers just a bit too thick and after an inch of layers the build was too high and during a travel move from side to side the no longer high enough nozzle impacted the build so hard that the “X” belt jumped the sprocket and the machine lost it’s registry of position, always at about the same spot.  Reduced the extrusion rate, end of that problem.

notes from 3D Printing:

Pg Sharrow One of the things I learned during years of plastic welding is that every formulation of plastic and COLOR behaves differently. White is different from Black. Blue or Red. Every time you change supplier or color you must change your technique.
Rob Smith I would print a temp tower… Believe it or not, every spool has its own ideal temperature, even if it’s the same material in the same color from the same manufacturer. Cura has a plugin called “ChangeAtZ” that makes it easy to change the temperature at specific layers, and there are dozens of models on Thingiverse to choose from. A good temp tower will have features that highlight bridging quality, overhangs, stringing control, and of course, surface finish. I like this one:

Rob Smith No problem! Protip: the temp tower is a great diagnostic tool, but it’s not the only one. There are a bunch of prints that are popular for “benchmarking” your printer’s performance… Lately Benchy has been the most popular ( and before that it was Marvin (… but if you’re really looking to fine-tune your printer, there’s a collection of carefully-chosen calibration prints to challenge your sanity:
If you have the chutzpah to try printing all of them a) remember each one is a unique purpose-built test, and it’s designed to be challenging, and b) post pictures!


#3DBenchy – The jolly 3D printing torture-test by by CreativeTools
 for setup of the IIIPv2 in Curia

Aaron Greengrass Printers are different enough from each other that there are no ‘standard’ settings. My hotend has had 4 different layer cooling fans. Each one requires a number of changes to print settings to get a good print. Of the 9 printers I’ve owned so far, only 2 have even been vaguely similar, and even they didn’t have identical settings. Test, adjust, and test again. Print slower. Watch a lot of youtube videos about dialing in printer settings. Look at the print troubleshooting pages (the one simplify3d has is pretty good). Expect this to require trial and error. Expect also that whatever settings you get working will require changes not only for different types of filament, but in many cases for different colors (ie translucent vs solid color print very differently)

Todd Saltzman The way you have to approach it is when your print comes out bad you need to identify what exactly is bad about it. Such as is it over extruding or being too stringy etc. then you need to look at the solutions to your problem and just adjust small things at a time.
advise and links I greatly appreciate…pg
link to hot end assembly and PID tuning :

The Great Coil

Great coil in disk

The great coil and plasma jet in place under the Disk frame

In this configuration the black coils are the primary and the white above is the necklace coils. Each of the necklace coils is a single loop terminated at a condenser unit distributed around the circumference of the disk along with the driving primary.

HV Coil with Pincushion plasma cone


The Original Device


bottom of old coil deck, coil is welded to the other side of the central portion of the device.


The original device was constructed of welded polypropylene, the bulge rings were built in condensers that were terminations of a necklace of wired loops  bundled with the primary loop of the Great Tesla coil. During early testing the condensers failed and could not be repaired. All of this outer works was cut away to salvage the Great Coil.

Tesla Coil plasma jet

Flat spiral wound tesla coil with central pincushion/plasma jet

The central part of this device is the flat wound spiral coil. This coil is created from about 1200ft of 14 gauge copper wire, 120 turns, at 5 turns to the inch, fixed with 5/32″ polypropylene rod welded to the 1/2 inch thick polypropylene deck. The insulation value between winding turns  was tested to 40,000 volts per turn or 4 million volts of stress for the entire coil. The coil center termination is a 8 inch disk with pins set in a 1/4 inch grid for 16 pins per inch square. The pincushion is inside a polypropylene forcing cone that terminates with a 2 inch plasma conduit. The necklace bundle is just visible inside the ring of the left picture, the central discoloration is the coil it’s self spiraling out from the pincushion/ plasma cone. During initial testing of the device, it was being directly powered from the 15,000 volt transformer when a lead came loose and began arching. The coil went into full Tesla mode of about 2 million volts at the pincushion. A violet plasma jet 6 feet high erupted from the cone! After 25-30 seconds the loose wire came free and the system died.

Some of the built in condensers were damaged and could not be repaired. The Great Coil was removed from the damaged device for further use as it would be very difficult to replace …pg

For a description of the Tesla Coil driver parts see:   Pictorial of parts.

For a description of the Tesla Coil  driver see:   primary-driver

for  the layout and parts test of driver:   condenser-sparkgap-test 

These above links will open new tabs so you won’t get lost…pg

Physics discussion on Aether Propulsion

disk gradiant

Physics discussion on Aether Propulsion

lifted from ChiefIO blog

25 September 2018 at 5:08 am


It is looking like pervasive “fields” are all that is real, and “particles” are just what you get when something pokes the field. (So a photon hitting the “electron field” causes the “electron particle” to come into being and changes the “2 slot” outcome to the particle form… )

Basically, if we don’t look then everything is a field. It is when we look that it becomes particles…

Isn’t QM fun? 8-} /sarc;

25 September 2018 at 5:49 am

“Basically, if we don’t look then everything is a field. It is when we look that it becomes particles…”
yup! pretty much sums it up. K.I.S.S. ! 😎 …pg

  • Simon Derricutt says:

25 September 2018 at 9:46 am

Maybe a lot of the problem with QM is that we can visualise waves OK, and we know about particles and how they collide, and neither the maths nor the visualisation work that well for something that is both at the same time. This isn’t helped by the Copenhagen interpretation, which tells us that it’s only when we look that the wave functions “collapse” into a single result from being indeterminate before we look. Given the age of the universe, and the lack of people to look and measure, it makes sense that things happen whether we look or not. That problem of only having a real result when someone measures it was got over with Bohmian Mechanics, where a “guiding wave” determines the position and direction of a real particle (which makes the wave and the particle there at the same time, and thus things can happen without anyone to measure them). However, this explanation wasn’t chosen, possibly because it effectively posits an Aether (the medium that the guiding wave exists in), and people were trying to go away from anything Aether-like. As I’ve said before, though, if you’re going to have waves of any sort, then as far as we can tell *something* will be waving, and a model with inertial minuscule particles with springs between them is bound to work for a lot of the properties. Basically, you can’t get away from some sort of Aether, even if you rename it as spacetime and say there can be waves in spacetime, unless of course you try to make a model where waves don’t exist and it’s only particles. Since a particle model isn’t going to match reality when it comes to diffraction unless you give the particles some wave properties, and again that implies something being waved, finding a non-paradoxical description has so far escaped us.

At the heart of QM we thus have paradox, which tells us we haven’t yet got a good description of what is actually happening. The models we’ve got mostly work pretty well despite the paradox, though, so it’s the best we’ve got at the moment and mostly we ignore the paradoxes and choose the description of particle or wave depending on which one gives the right answer. Another problem with current theory is that it has inconvenient infinities turning up in the maths. Where these turn up, the technique of “renormalisation” is used, which basically means we ignore the infinities and take them out of the equations, and the rest of the equation then gives the right answer. It’s a fudge, and wasn’t liked at the time it was introduced (can’t remember who by), but sorts the problem. . Wikipedia has a nice explanation, too, that goes quite a bit deeper.

One thing that bugs me about all this complex maths is that it’s logical that the particles/waves themselves don’t have the capacity to do all the partial derivatives and integrations to work out where they ought to be. They really should simply react to the forces they see at any point in time (here and now forces and what happens as a result) and though the resultant path may be a little complex such as a conic section, it still ought to be calculable using numerical simulation where we use timesteps and the configuration/forces at each point and thus step through positions of the constituent parts.

Of course, all these theories assume momentum is absolutely conserved in an interaction, and that apart from borrowing/returning to the Heisenberg energy bank, that energy is conserved too. That may not be a valid assumption. It’s almost certainly the net result after an interaction (we normally see energy and momentum conserved), but may not be valid during the interaction. If inertia is quantised (as seems to be true from cosmological observations) then this will apply at the particle level too, and rather than being a continuous range, momentum can only be exchanged (or changed) in quanta. It’s possible that this may change the maths quite a lot. A small force won’t thus affect the velocity (below the necessary force to jump to the next momentum level), and the path of a particle won’t be a smooth curve but instead a series of straight lines as the momentum has step-changes. I figure that might make some difference to the calculations….

Feynman was required reading when I was learning physics. He was good at explaining things, and where he found things that didn’t make sense he changed them so they did make sense. Probably killed a few sacred cows on the way, and his personal life was unconventional too. I see nothing wrong in watching his lectures for entertainment. I haven’t the time this morning, so I’ll watch them somewhat later. More fun than a Marvel blockbuster with fights between groups of people with magic powers.

25 September 2018 at 1:52 pm

@Simon; Excellent essay on the logic of the problem of waves that appear to be particles, particles that behave as waves. Quantaize the medium, Call it what you want. I prefer Aether and this results in Mass/Inertia being external to Mater, the thing that matters to me…pg

25 September 2018 at 2:30 pm

If you “kick” the Aether hard enough (voltage) and fast enough (frequency) It will kick back hard. Just like the results in a Tesla coil operation. If you are operating a cone shape field by pulsing a signal over a cone or saucer shape within the high voltage/high frequency field you are operating a linear motor within the activated Aether. Electronic Propulsion!…pg

More about pg


Back in the winter of 63-64 I was sent to a symposium being put on at Cal Berkley for budding young scientists to join their next years student body. We were given a selection of departments to go through on a show and tell. I chose the Physics Lab. and the Soils Lab.

The Physics Lab. had a lot of cool stuff, “Giant” new cyclotron and all the latest equipment being operated by Laurence Radiation Laboratories. I found their “toys” equipment fascinating. Their bs science, which they were very proud of,  mainly boring. Later at the presentation of the grad students papers, I pointed out that the conclusions drawn from one experiment could have several other causes. The grad student was not pleased that a 17 year old “hick from the sticks” would critique His science!

The Soils Lab was quite a shock! Their science was in how to “Destroy Soil” to make it solid underlay to build on. I had spent 4 years learning how to create and husband soils for farming. Was something of an expert at it. These guys were teaching how to ruin it!
What would you expect at Berzerkly….pg


for a bit more see An Engineers’ Tale

Further evidence of Aether

ESO/L. Calçada

We just got the first real evidence of a strange quantum distortion in empty space

It’s taken us 80 years to witness this.

1 DEC 2016

For the first time, astronomers have observed a strange quantum phenomenon in action, where a neutron star is surrounded by a magnetic field so intense, it’s given rise to a region in empty space where matter spontaneously pops in and out of existence.

Called vacuum birefringence, this bizarre phenomenon was first predicted back in the 1930s, but had only ever been observed on the atomic scale. Now scientists have finally seen it occur in nature, and it goes against everything thatNewton and Einstein had mapped out.

More of article

Further evidence of the existence of Aether filling all of space. There Ain’t Nothing in Space! Space is jam packed full of something. Something that is effected by magnetic or Electro-Motive-Force. This EMF yields the phenomena of Mass/Inertia and Gravity…pg

EMF Thruster really Works

Artist concept of activity within thruster cavity that creates external thrust.


pictures of test device in front of vacuum  chamber.


A vacuum test campaign evaluating the impulsive thrust performance of a tapered radio-frequency test article excited in the transverse magnitude 212 mode at 1937 MHz has been completed. The test campaign consisted of a forward thrust phase and reverse thrust phase at vacuum with power scans at 40, 60, and 80 W. The test campaign included a null thrust test effort to identify any mundane sources of impulsive thrust; however, none were identified. Thrust data from forward, reverse, and null suggested that the system was consistently performing.

Read More:

An EMF propulsion device that really works! Next will be a test in space. A renewed NASA will have a new toy. The paradigm of the “Fabric of Space” will need to be rewritten..again…pg

Also see Impossible EM Thruster

From paper;  Discussion  

    Before providing some qualitative thoughts on the proposed physics potentially at work in the tapered RF test articles, it will be useful to provide a brief background on the supporting physics lines of thought. In short, the supporting physics model used to derive a force based on operating conditions in the test article can be categorized as a nonlocal hidden-variable theory, or pilot-wave theory for short.

Pilot-wave theories are a family of realist interpretations of quantum mechanics that conjecture that the statistical nature of the formalism of quantum mechanics is due to an ignorance of an underlying more fundamental real dynamics, and that microscopic particles follow real trajectories over time just like larger classical bodies do. The first pilot-wave theory was proposed by de Broglie in 1923 [4], where he proposed that a particle interacted with an accompanying guiding wave field, or pilot wave, and this interaction was responsible for guiding the particle along its trajectory, orthogonal to the surfaces of constant phase. In 1926, Madelung [5] published a hydrodynamic model of quantum mechanics by recasting the linear Schrödinger equation into hydrodynamic form, where the Planck constant was analogous to a surface tension σσ in shallow-water hydrodynamics and vacuum fluctuations were the reason for quantum mechanics. In 1952, Bohm [6,7] published a pilot-wave theory where the guiding wave was equivalent to the solution of the Schrödinger equation and a particle’s velocity was equivalent to the quantum velocity of probability. Soon after, the Bohmian mechanics line of thinking was extended by others to incorporate the effects of a stochastic subquantum realm, and de Broglie augmented his initial pilot-wave theory with this approach in 1964 [8], adopting the parlance “hidden thermodynamics.” A family of models categorized as vacuum-based pilot-wave theories or stochastic electrodynamics (SED) [9] further explored the concept that the electromagnetic vacuum fluctuations of the zero point field represent a natural source of stochasticity in the subquantum realm and provide classical explanations for the origin of the Planck constant, Casimir effect, ground state of hydrogen, and much more.

It should be noted that the pilot-wave domain experienced an early setback when von Neumann [10] published an impossibility proof against the idea of any hidden-variable theory. This and other subsequent impossibility proofs were later discredited by Bell 30 years later in 1966 [11], and Bell went on to say in the preface of his 1987 book [12] that the pilot wave eliminated the shifty boundary between wavy quantum states on the one hand and Bohr’s classical terms on the other: said simply, there was a real quantum dynamics underlying the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.

Although the idea of a pilot wave or realist interpretation of quantum mechanics is not the dominant view of physics today (which favors the Copenhagen interpretation), it has seen a strong resurgence of interest over the last decade based on some experimental work pioneered by Couder and Fort [13]. Couder and Fort discovered that bouncing a millimeter-sized droplet on a vibrating shallow fluid bath at just the right resonance frequency created a scenario where the bouncing droplet created a wave pattern on the shallow bath that also seemed to guide the droplet along its way. To Couder and Fort, this seemed very similar to the pilot-wave concept just discussed and, in subsequent testing by Couder and others, this macroscopic classical system was able to exhibit characteristics thought to be restricted to the quantum realm. To date, this hydrodynamic pilot-wave analog system has been able to duplicate the double slit experiment findings, tunneling, quantized orbits, and numerous other quantum phenomena. Bush put together two thorough review papers chronicling the experimental work being done in this domain by numerous universities [14,15].

In addition to these quantum analogs, there may already be direct evidence supportive of the pilot-wave approach: specifically, Bohmian trajectories may have been observed by two separate experiments working with photons [16,17]. Reconsidering the double slit experiment with the pilot-wave view, the photon goes through one slit, and the pilot wave goes through both slits. The resultant trajectories that photons follow arTruespacee continuous real trajectories that are affected by the pilot wave’s probabilistic interference pattern with itself as it undergoes constructive and destructive interference due to reflections from the slits.

In the approach used in the quantum vacuum plasma thruster (also known as a Q thruster) supporting physics models, the zero point field (ZPF) plays the role of the guiding wave in a similar manner to the vacuum-based pilot-wave theories. To be specific, the vacuum fluctuations (virtual fermions and virtual photons) serves as the dynamic medium that guides a real particle on its way. Two recent papers authored by members of this investigation team explored the scientific ramifications of this ZPF-based background medium. The first paper [18] considered the quantum vacuum at the cosmological scale in which a thought experiment applied to the Einstein tensor yielded an equation that related the gravitational constant to the quantity of vacuum energy in the universe, implying that gravity might be viewed as an emergent phenomenon: a long wavelength consequence of the quantum vacuum. This viewpoint was scaled down to the atomic level to predict the density of the quantum vacuum in the presence of ordinary matter. This approach yielded a predicted value for the Bohr radius and electron mass with a direct dependency on dark energy. The corollary from this work pertinent to the q-thruster models is that the quantum vacuum is a dynamic medium and could potentially be modeled at the microscopic scale as an electron-positron plasma. The quantum vacuum around the hydrogen nucleus was considered in much more detail in the second paper [19]. Here, the energy density of the quantum vacuum was shown to theoretically have a 1/r41/r4 dependency moving away from the hydrogen nucleus (or proton). This 1/r41/r4 dependency was correlated to the Casimir force, suggesting that the energy density in the quantum vacuum is dependent on geometric constraints and energy densities in electric/magnetic fields. This paper created a quasi-classical model of the hydrogen atom in the COMSOL Multiphysics software (COMSOL is not an acronym) that modeled the vacuum around the proton as an electron-positron plasma. These analysis results showed that the n=1n=1 to 7 energy levels of the hydrogen atom could be viewed as longitudinal resonant acoustic wave modes in the quantum vacuum. This suggests that the idea of treating the quantum vacuum as a dynamic medium capable of supporting oscillations might be valid. If a medium is capable of supporting acoustic oscillations, this means that the internal constituents were capable of interacting and exchanging momentum.

If the vacuum is indeed mutable and degradable as was explored, then it might be possible to do/extract work on/from the vacuum, and thereby be possible to push off of the quantum vacuum and preserve the laws of conservation of energy and conservation of momentum. It is proposed that the tapered RF test article pushes off of quantum vacuum fluctuations, and the thruster generates a volumetric body force and moves in one direction while a wake is established in the quantum vacuum that moves in the other direction.

A vacuum test campaign that used an updated integrated test article and optimized torsion pendulum layout was completed. The test campaign consisted of a forward thrust element that included performing testing at ambient pressure to establish and confirm good tuning, as well as subsequent power scans at 40, 60, and 80 W, with three thrust runs performed at each power setting for a total of nine runs at vacuum. The test campaign consisted of a reverse thrust element that mirrored the forward thrust element. The test campaign included a null thrust test effort of three tests performed at vacuum at 80 W to try and identify any mundane sources of impulsive thrust; none were identified. Thrust data from forward, reverse, and null suggested that the system was consistently performing at 1.2±0.1  mN/kW1.2±0.1  mN/kW, which was very close to the average impulsive performance measured in air. A number of error sources were considered and discussed. Although thermal shift was addressed to a degree with this test campaign, future testing efforts should seek to develop testing approaches that are immune to CG shifts from thermal expansion. As indicated in Sec. II.C.8, a modified Cavendish balance approach could be employed to definitively rule out thermal. Although this test campaign was not focused on optimizing performance and was more an exercise in existence proof, it is still useful to put the observed thrust-to-power figure of 1.2  mN/kW1.2  mN/kW in context. The current state-of–the-art thrust to power for a Hall thruster is on the order of 60  mN/kW60  mN/kW. This is an order of magnitude higher than the test article evaluated during the course of this vacuum campaign; however, for missions with very large delta-v requirements, having a propellant consumption rate of zero could offset the higher power requirements. The 1.2  mN/kW1.2  mN/kW performance parameter is over two orders of magnitude higher than other forms of “zero-propellant” propulsion, such as light sails, laser propulsion, and photon rockets having thrust-to-power levels in the 3.336.67  μN/kW3.33–6.67  μN/kW (or 0.00330.0067  mN/kW0.0033–0.0067  mN/kW) range.     G. G. SpanjersAssociate Editor


I guess they will need Aether for this thing to work.

As they only used 300 volts as the bias field, They will need to study Tesla’s work, as MUCH higher voltages will be needed to really get traction on the stuff of space. At least 100 times greater to get real traction.


Tesla’s dream of an EMF propulsion system will be achieved and humans will have their Truespace drive. The second gift from GOD for this era…pg

Are Climate changes caused by Solar activity variations ?

Documentation of the solar activity variations and it’s influence on climate

Dimitris Poulos

Abstract of paper from:

The four planets that influence the most the solar surface through tidal forcing seem to affect the Earth climate. A simple two cosine model with periods 251 years, of the seasonality of the Earth – Venus syzygies, and 265.4 years, of the combined syzygies of Jupiter and Mercury with Earth when Earth is in synod with Venus, fits well the Northern Hemisphere temperatures of the last 1000 years as reconstructed by Jones et al (1998). The physical mechanism proposed is that planetary gravitational forces drive solar activity that in turn drives temperature variations in earth. The sun is in a boundary balance state at one hand collapsing due to gravity and at the other hand expanding due to fusion, and as such it should be heavily influenced by minimal external forcings such as planetary gravity. Sound waves in the solar mass, created from the planetary movement, are responsible for the formation of solar corona and sun spots. The Earth-Venus 251 year resonance is resonant to a near surface solar layer’s thermal natural frequency that “explodes” to form solar wind. The calculated solar wind properties match the observed.

 link to  pdf

Solar energy output.

Energy creation and output from the Sun is a factor of matter-energy density. Whether Fission or Fusion, changes in matter-energy density causes changes in Neutron decay or creation and therefor energy creation and output.

Just like a boiling pot of water that has a pressure set 212f /100c temperature of output, so the sun has a pressure set temperature of output, or TSI ( Total Solar Irradiance)  .surface temperature of approximately 5,778 K (5,505 °C, 9,941 °F). This is very stable. Just like the pot of water, changes in energy are manifest as “steam” wind output changes and not temperature change. During changes in solar output there are changes in the spectral signature of the solar TSI  Moving toward the higher frequencies as the output increases. Lower frequencies penetrate deeper into the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans but higher frequencies carry more energy.

The solar system is composed of a number of Sun orbiting bodies. Each causes some amount of gravitational pull on the solar body, as their position changes it changes the position of the center of gravity of the solar system

Changes in the Solar System center of gravity causes the solar body to move to and fro In it’s attempt to center it’s self with the local gravitational field. While there is an argument that this makes no difference as the sun is in “free-fall”.  All of the sun has mass, mass that resists changes in motion. Local tidal movements cause changes in local matter-energy density causing changes in local Fission/Fusion and therefore energy creation and output being caused by the position changes of the orbiting planets…pg

Discovery of Gravity Waves?

Febuary 11 2016  LIGO

LIGO announces discovery of gravity waves.  pdf


 A pictorial representation of gravity waves in the fabric of space caused by 2 black holes spiraling together

Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory:

For the first time, scientists have observed ripples in the fabric of spacetime called gravitational waves, arriving at the earth from a cataclysmic event in the distant universe. This confirms a major prediction of Albert Einstein’s 1915 general theory of relativity and opens an unprecedented new window onto the cosmos.

Gravitational waves carry information about their dramatic origins and about the nature of gravity that cannot otherwise be obtained. Physicists have concluded that the detected gravitational waves were produced during the final fraction of a second of the merger of two black holes to produce a single, more massive spinning black hole. This collision of two black holes had been predicted but never observed.
The gravitational waves were detected on September 14, 2015 at 5:51 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (09:51 UTC) by both of the twin Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory
(LIGO) detectors, located in Livingston, Louisiana, and Hanford, Washington, USA.
The LIGO Observatories are funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), and were conceived, built, and are operated by Caltech and MIT. The discovery, accepted for publication in the journal Physical Review Letters, was made by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
The twin Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors,

Aerial view of the LIGO detector in Hanford, WA. [Image: LIGO] – See more at:
Basic Design of the LIGO Interferometer
Layout of the LIGO Interferometer that measures the warpage of the earth as the force passes through the material of the planet. Lasers measure the differences in distance between the detectors as the earth is effected by the passing wave. The use of two observatories revels the direction of the point of origin.
At each observatory, the two-and-a-half-mile (4-km) long L-shaped LIGO interferometer uses laser light split into two beams that travel back and forth down the arms (four-foot diameter tubes kept under a near-perfect vacuum). The beams are used to monitor the distance between mirrors precisely positioned at the ends of the arms. According to Einstein’s theory, the distance between the mirrors will change by an infinitesimal amount when a gravitational wave passes by the detector. A change in the lengths of the arms smaller than one-ten-thousandth the diameter of a proton, (10 to the-19) meter, can be detected.

Now that I have the experiment information down I can make my own remarks. A good follow up article on the experiment and it’s equipment.

The detection of gravitational waves – a triumph of science enabled by fossil fuels

It is wonderful that real experiments are carried out and reported on. But I reserve the right to infer my own conclusions from the results…pg

Another Planet?

 Another ninth planet


On Jan. 20, scientists announced that a planet about 10 times more massive than Earth likely lurks in the distant outer solar system, orbiting perhaps 600 times farther from the sun than Earth does on average.

The evidence for the existence of this “Planet Nine” is indirect at the moment; computer models suggest a big, undiscovered world has shaped the strange orbits of multiple objects in the Kuiper Belt, the ring of icy bodies beyond Neptune. But direct evidence could come relatively soon, in the form of a telescope observation, Planet Nine’s proposers say.

Scientists believe they may have found a giant planet in our distant solar system, possibly the long-sought after Planet X.

It is believed to have a mass about 10 times that of Earth and orbits about 20 times farther from the Sun on average than does Neptune. As a result, it would take this new planet between 10,000 and 20,000 years to make just one full orbit around the Sun.

This may or may not be the giant planet that the Ancients speak of. One that orbits as close to the sun as the asteroid belt and then out again for 3600 years. This one is not a part of the 8 planet elliptical group, but orbits above and below the solar elliptic nearly 90 degrees.

At this point this is just an educated guess on where to look and what to expect.

The better our tools, the more we can surmise and see…pg

For the full article